Skip to content Skip to footer

OGUN: Supreme Court Dismisses Jimi Lawal’s Appeal, Others

The Peoples Democratic Party’s governorship candidate in Ogun State, Hon. (Dr) Oladipupo Adebutu has won all the Supreme Court cases filed by Otunba Jimi Lawal and his loyalists.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed all four substantive cases filed by Otunba Jimi Lawal and Olabode Idris & co. against the unanimous judgments of the appeal court in suits No. CA/IB/411/2022 and CA/IB/411A/2022 delivered on 28th November, 2022 in Ibadan.

The appeals instituted by one of the governorship aspirants, Jimi Lawal and some ward delegates were dismissed on the grounds that they have no cause of action.

Leading a five-man panel of Justices, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, dismissed the appeals following their withdrawals by the respective lawyers.

In one of the appeals, filed by Tayo Olabode against the PDP governorship candidate in Ogun, Oladipupo Adebutu, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that the delegates who filed the action lacked the legal right to do so.

It was agreed that the delegates who claimed to have been disenfranchised in the PDP primary  that produced Adebutu, cannot initiate any court action against the primary since they were not aspirants in the election.

The supreme court held that the law is clear that only an aspirant in a primary election conducted for the purpose of nominating candidates for election, can lawfully challenge the outcome and not any other party member.

In another appeal, that was predicated on the failure to serve originating summon on the defendant, the court held that since the aggrieved defendant participated in the matter from the beginning to the end, the issue of service can no longer take the front burner.

Tayo Olabode, who led a team of the ward delegates, had in his suit on behalf of his colleagues, alleged that they were disenfranchised from participating in the governorship primary election.

He specifically requested the court to quash the primary election that produced Adebutu on the ground that unlawful delegates conducted the primary election.

At the day’s proceedings, the Justices put various questions to the lawyers in the appeals, which were answered negatively.

It was unanimously agreed in the open court that notwithstanding the anger of the aggrieved ward delegates, they are not legally permitted to challenge a primary election in which they were not aspirants.

Show CommentsClose Comments

Leave a comment